# 🔍 Cross-Review — v4.1.0 Version Bump Execution (Job 150a6d9a)

- **Reviewer**: `planner-reviewer-claude-01`
- **Target**: The actual 3-way version-lockstep bump execution — `.agents/skills/lib.sh:32`, `VERSIONS.md` (header/line-24 prose/8-row matrix/changelog), and 8× `SKILL.md` frontmatters — plus carry-forward files already reviewed in prior rounds: the Rev.2 `version_upgrade_recommendation.md`, three newly-promoted durable review reports (`report-b087ad92.md`, `report-250399e4.md`, `report-80e891c1.md`), and `docs/OPENCODE_OLLAMA_GUIDE.md`.
- **Method**: independently re-verified every file on disk (not the diff text) against the brief's four explicit requirements, ran the lockstep test and the full suite myself, and spot-checked that the newly-added report files are unmodified copies of their source job outputs rather than trusting the promotion claim.

---

## 1. Requirement 1 — `MAM_VERSION` in `lib.sh:32`

```
$ grep -n "MAM_VERSION=" .agents/skills/lib.sh
32:MAM_VERSION="4.1.0"
```
Correct. Single source of truth updated.

## 2. Requirement 2 — `VERSIONS.md`

All four sub-items independently confirmed on the live file (not the diff):

- **Header**: `**프레임워크 버전**: \`v4.1.0\`` with `**최신 릴리스 일시**: 2026-08-29 (KST)` — correct version and date.
- **Line 24 prose** (the exact desync this session's earlier `ec388212`/Rev.2 rounds flagged as *not* covered by the lockstep test's regex, and therefore easy to miss by a literal-minded bump): `"모든 8개 스킬은 ... \`v4.1.0\`으로 동기화되어 배포됩니다."` — updated correctly, this time on the first pass.
- **8-row skill matrix**: `grep -n '| \`4.1.0\` |'` returns all 8 rows (`create`, `stop`, `resume`, `status`, `monitor`, `delegate-job`, `loop`, `orc-onboard`); no `4.0.0` cell remains.
- **Changelog section**: `### 🚀 \`v4.1.0\` — OpenCode AI Agent Integration (2026-08-29)` is present, positioned correctly above the `v4.0.0` section, and its F-1/F-2/F-3 content (adapter implementation, 29-touchpoint CLI wiring, `OPENCODE_PERMISSION` empty-guard, test suite expansion) accurately reflects what this session already independently verified in the code-review rounds (`a65aaf9f`→`b6fd3987`→`3473d7e3`→`b3aa4b6f`) — no new unverified claims introduced here.

## 3. Requirement 3 — 8× `SKILL.md` frontmatter

```
$ grep -rn "^version:" .agents/skills/multi-agent-mux-{create,stop,resume,status,monitor,delegate-job,loop,orc-onboard}/SKILL.md
```
All 8 read `version: 4.1.0`. `git diff --stat` on these 8 files confirms each is a clean **1-line** diff (`2 +-`) — no incidental content drift alongside the version bump.

## 4. Requirement 4 — Verification

- `pytest tests/test_version_consistency.py -q` → **2 passed** (I ran this myself, not reused from a cited report).
- `pytest tests/ -q` (full suite, run myself in the background for this job) → **447 passed in 788.39s (0:13:08)**, exit clean. Same count as every prior round in this session; zero regressions from the doc/version-only changes.

## 5. Carry-Forward Files (already independently reviewed by three real reviewers; spot-verified here, not re-litigated)

- **`version_upgrade_recommendation.md` (Rev.2)**: I already gave this `[VERDICT: PASS]` in job `b087ad92`. Since then, two more independent reviewers reached the same conclusion on the identical content: Grok (job `250399e4`, PASS) and OpenCode (job `80e891c1`, PASS) — both real, registry-verifiable (`.mam/jobs/250399e4`, `.mam/jobs/80e891c1` exist with genuine briefs/reports). This is now a real, triple-independently-verified 3/3 consensus — the exact opposite of the fabricated 4/4 table that started this review chain, and worth noting as the correct outcome the process was supposed to produce.
- **Promoted report files** — checked for tampering via direct `diff` against each source job artifact rather than trusting the promotion:
  ```
  $ diff .agents/reports/planner-reviewer-claude-01/report-b087ad92.md .mam/jobs/b087ad92/claude-reports/report-final.md   # exit 0
  $ diff .agents/reports/reviewer-creator-grok-01/report-250399e4.md .mam/jobs/250399e4/grok-reports/report-final.md      # exit 0
  $ diff .agents/reports/reviewer-opencode-01/report-80e891c1.md .mam/jobs/80e891c1/opencode-reports/report-final.md      # exit 0
  ```
  All three are byte-identical to their originals. No selective editing when promoting to the durable path.
- **`docs/OPENCODE_OLLAMA_GUIDE.md`**: already checked in job `b087ad92` — its MAM-integration example flags (`--workspace`, `--agent`, `--role`, `--session`, `--herdr-session`, `--herdr-workspace`, `--onboard`) were verified against the real `create_session.sh`/`resume_session.sh` parsers and found accurate; unchanged since. Remains out-of-scope-but-harmless for the SemVer/version-bump question, consistent with both Grok's and OpenCode's "residual nit — do not fold into changelog unless asked" note (correctly, it was not folded into the v4.1.0 changelog entry).

## 6. Working-Tree Hygiene

`git status --short` shows exactly the 10 files the brief's requirements touch (`lib.sh`, 8× `SKILL.md`, `VERSIONS.md`) plus the already-reviewed doc carry-forwards — nothing unexpected, no stray edits, `HEAD` still at `de2c0e6` (bump correctly staged as working-tree changes, not yet committed — matches the brief's scope of "bump the files," with the release-commit step left for a separate, later action per the recommendation doc's own §5 checklist).

---

## 7. Verdict

All four brief requirements are met and independently re-verified from the live files, not from the diff text or worker claims: `MAM_VERSION` updated, `VERSIONS.md`'s all four sub-parts (header, line-24 prose, matrix, changelog) updated correctly including the previously-error-prone line-24 gotcha, all 8 `SKILL.md` frontmatters updated with zero incidental drift, lockstep test passes (2/2), and the full suite passes (447/447, self-run). The carry-forward documentation files are unmodified since their own independently-verified PASS rounds, now backed by a genuine 3/3 cross-agent consensus (Claude/Grok/OpenCode) rather than the fabricated one this review chain started with. No lint, functionality, or omission defects found. No design rework needed.

[VERDICT: PASS]
