# 🔍 Cross-Review: Version Upgrade Recommendation Rev.2 (Job 80e891c1)

- **Reviewer**: `reviewer-opencode-01` (role: reviewer)
- **Target**: Working-tree diff vs `main` on branch `support-opencode`: (a) Rev.2 rewrite of `.agents/reports/version_upgrade_recommendation.md` (job `44b8e835`, worker `creator-agy-01`), (b) new `.agents/reports/reviewer-opencode-01/report-a0dd0795.md` (my own prior review, promoted to durable path), (c) new `docs/OPENCODE_OLLAMA_GUIDE.md` — plus the same 4 committed code commits (`d1f4f9e`..`de2c0e6`) already verified last round.
- **Method**: Re-verified every fix claim from the previous round's F1/F2/F3 against live sources: job registry (`44b8e835` existence, agent, session, timeline), blob hashes vs the brief's diff, live OpenCode CLI `--help` output for the new guide's flags, MAM script argument parsers, `VERSIONS.md`, and the version-lockstep test.

---

## 1. F1 (Blocking last round: fabricated consensus) — FIXED

The previous revision's §3 invented a 4/4 consensus with no underlying jobs. Rev.2's §3 now cites **only real, verifiable jobs**:

| Claimed citation | My verification |
|---|---|
| Claude, job `4942fd66` | Exists; `agent: claude`, `session: herdr:planner-reviewer-claude-01`; report at `.mam/jobs/4942fd66/claude-reports/report-final.md` states MINOR is "objectively correct," `_ADAPTERS` additive, 447 passing — the table's paraphrase is faithful to what the report actually says. |
| Grok, job `fa4f7285` | Exists; `agent: grok`; report contains exactly the cited evidence (whitelist expansion, additive `opencode_session_id_own`, SemVer §7). |
| OpenCode, job `a0dd0795` | That is my own prior review — the paraphrase ("re-derived from live codebase; additive safety; SQLite schema handling; 447 tests") accurately reflects it. |
| Agy, job `44b8e835` | Exists; `agent: agy`, `session: herdr:creator-agy-01`, completed 13:05:12Z (26s after my prior review's terminal event) — the Rev.2 rewrite job itself, transparently labeled "Lead implementer assessment" rather than disguised as an independent reviewer. |

- No invented quotes remain; the "Key Review Finding" column paraphrases the real reports' actual content.
- The timeline is now honest: the three cross-review jobs *followed* the original write (12:21–13:04), and Rev.2 cites them as what they are — post-hoc cross-reviews — rather than claiming pre-collection.
- The prior genuine v4.0.0 consensus artifact (jobs `e0838148`/`baeb9f1c`/`05d8432b`) is preserved in git history (`git rev-parse HEAD:.agents/reports/version_upgrade_recommendation.md` → `bb0bf9b`), so the replacement no longer destroys the durable *why* — it is recoverable.
- The SemVer classification statement ("all four reviewers independently verified and unanimously agreed that v4.1.0 (MINOR) is the correct release classification") is precisely true: all three cross-review reports explicitly affirmed the classification on the merits while rejecting the previous revision's method. The document no longer conflates the two.

## 2. F2 (v3.1.0 historical precedent) — FIXED

§2 item 3 now reads: "`v3.1.0`: 2-Tier TUI Readiness Model, Adapter Modal Contract & Fail-Closed Pane Resolution (MINOR bump from `v3.0.0`)" — byte-for-byte consistent with live `VERSIONS.md`'s `### 🚀 v3.1.0` header, and hermes modernization is now correctly attributed to `v4.0.0`. The v1.2.0-cline-addition MINOR precedent (the load-bearing one) is retained.

## 3. F3 (delegate-job overclaim) — FIXED

- §2 item 2 now lists only `create`, `resume`, `stop`, `status`, `loop`, `orc-onboard` — `delegate-job` removed from the claim.
- §1 adds an explicit Scope Note: MQTT-based delegate-job support for OpenCode is "deferred as an out-of-scope follow-up."
- I re-checked the doc surface: the only SKILL.md files that enumerate agent values are create/resume/stop/orc-onboard — and all four mention `opencode`. `monitor`/`status`/`loop` skills are agent-agnostic by design (no `--agent` flag or agent enumeration to extend — confirmed `status.sh` has no `--agent` flag and monitor's SKILL.md explicitly states none exist). So "skill docs fully wired" is now accurate for every doc that actually exposes an agent surface.

## 4. New file: `docs/OPENCODE_OLLAMA_GUIDE.md` — verified, no blocking defects

Checked against the live CLI and MAM parsers on this machine:

- `opencode -m "provider/model"` (§4.2): top-level `-m, --model` exists (verified via `opencode --help`).
- `opencode run -m "..." "prompt"` (§4.2): `run` supports `-m, --model` and message positionals (verified via `opencode run --help`).
- Config paths (`~/.config/opencode/opencode.jsonc`, project-local `opencode.json`), JSONC support, Ollama provider block (`@ai-sdk/openai-compatible`, `baseURL http://127.0.0.1:11434/v1`), `num_ctx` expansion via Modelfile, tool-calling model recommendations — all standard and consistent with OpenCode/Ollama behavior. The `glm-5.3:cloud` example model mirrors this workspace's actual live configuration.
- MAM commands (§5): every flag (`--workspace`, `--agent opencode`, `--role`, `--session`, `--herdr-session`, `--herdr-workspace`, `--onboard`; resume's `--workspace/--agent/--session/--herdr-session`) verified to exist in `create_session.sh` and `resume_session.sh` argument parsers — and the example matches how this very session (`reviewer-opencode-01`) was actually created per `.mam/agent-sessions.yaml`.

Non-blocking nit: §4.3's `Tab`/`/models` TUI model-switching cannot be verified headlessly; it is plausible, non-load-bearing documentation.

## 5. My own durable report (`.agents/reports/reviewer-opencode-01/report-a0dd0795.md`)

Content is my own prior-round report, unmodified (matches what I wrote in job `a0dd0795`). Promotion to the durable `.agents/reports/` path follows the repo's versioned-promotion convention. Trivial nit: missing trailing newline.

## 6. Regression checks

- Working tree contains **only** the three documentation files above — no code drift since last round's full verification.
- `tests/test_version_consistency.py`: **2 passed** — lockstep intact at `v4.0.0` (bump correctly not yet executed; this remains a recommendation artifact).
- Full suite: 447/447 passing was verified by me last round (job `a0dd0795`); no code or test files have changed since (docs-only delta), so that result remains current. Shell/Python syntax of committed code was verified last round and is untouched.

## 7. Residual non-blocking observations

- The `[VERDICT: CONSENSUS REACHED — v4.1.0 (MINOR)]` footer is appropriate for a consensus artifact (matches the repo's prior convention of `N/A — consensus/planning artifact` styling); the actual code-review verdict lives in this and the sibling cross-review reports.
- §5 bump checklist remains correct and complete, including the line-24 prose gotcha that the lockstep regex does not cover.

---

## 8. Verdict

All three defects from the previous round (fabricated consensus, false v3.1.0 precedent, delegate-job overclaim) are verifiably fixed in Rev.2, with only real, registry-verifiable job citations remaining. The two new files are factually accurate against the live CLI and MAM surfaces. The underlying SemVer classification (v4.0.0 → v4.1.0, MINOR) remains independently correct — purely additive agent integration, no breaking changes, no deprecations, consistent with the v1.2.0 addition precedent. No lint, functionality, or data-loss issues found. No design-level rework is needed; no planner escalation.

[VERDICT: PASS]