# 🔍 Cross-Review: v4.1.0 Version Bump Execution (Job 0820d0ed)

- **Reviewer**: `reviewer-opencode-01` (role: reviewer)
- **Target**: Working-tree diff vs `main` on branch `support-opencode`: the executed v4.1.0 3-way lockstep bump (worker job `cbc67b73`, `creator-agy-01`) — `lib.sh`, `VERSIONS.md`, 8× `SKILL.md` frontmatters, changelog — plus the Rev.2 recommendation doc and 5 report/guide files carried over from the previously verified round.
- **Method**: Every check below re-run by me, not taken from the worker's (`cbc67b73`) or Claude's (`150a6d9a`) claims: lockstep test, full 447-test suite, per-file diffs, stray-literal sweep, job registry verification of every citation.

---

## 1. Bump Verification (my own runs)

| Check | Result |
|---|---|
| `lib.sh:32` | `MAM_VERSION="4.1.0"` — diff is exactly one line, no other change in the file |
| 8× `SKILL.md` frontmatter | All `version: 4.1.0` (create, stop, resume, status, monitor, delegate-job, loop, orc-onboard) |
| `VERSIONS.md` header | `v4.1.0`, release date `2026-08-29 (KST)` |
| `VERSIONS.md` prose (line 26, lockstep-regex-invisible) | `v4.1.0`으로 동기화 — the known line-24/26 desync gotcha from the `ec388212` round correctly handled |
| `VERSIONS.md` matrix | All 8 rows `4.1.0` |
| `VERSIONS.md` changelog | New `### 🚀 v4.1.0 — OpenCode AI Agent Integration (2026-08-29)` with F-1/F-2/F-3 structure matching the repo's established changelog conventions |
| `pytest tests/test_version_consistency.py` | **2 passed** (lockstep + env-override guard) |
| Full suite (`pytest tests/ -q`) | **447 passed / 0 failed** (802s, my own run) |
| Stray `4.0.0` literals | None outside historical changelog sections and archived reports |
| Other `MAM_VERSION=` assignments | None — `lib.sh` remains the single source of truth |

The lockstep test itself reads versions dynamically (no hardcoded expectations), so it correctly enforces the *new* triple. The `test_mam_version_is_not_env_overridable` guard still holds at 4.1.0.

## 2. Changelog Content Accuracy (F-1/F-2/F-3 claims vs code)

- **F-1 (adapter)**: `lib_py/agents/adapters/opencode.py` + `registry.py` registration — true (verified in prior rounds; unchanged here).
- **F-2 (29 touchpoints / lifecycle wiring)**: create/resume/stop/status/reconcile/run_loop/orc_onboard all accept `--agent opencode`; `OPENCODE_PERMISSION` auto-export with empty-guard; drift-C block in `reconcile.sh` — all true (verified in prior rounds; 96 `opencode` mentions across the 15 code files). The claim is the same scoped one the peer reviewers already accepted.
- **F-3 (tests / 447)**: I re-ran the full suite myself this round: **447/447**. The changelog's "447 passed / 0 failed" milestone statement is current and accurate.
- Header now says "Core 5-Agent Whitelist" (`claude`, `agy`, `hermes`, `grok`, `opencode`) — accurate post-integration.

## 3. Process Verification (job registry)

- The bump was performed by job `cbc67b73` (agy, `creator-agy-01`, 13:28–13:30Z) — real, with brief and archived report.
- Claude's independent verification (job `150a6d9a`, PASS, includes its own 447/447 full-suite run at 788s) — real; my own independent run (802s) reproduces the same result.
- The Rev.2 recommendation doc (`version_upgrade_recommendation.md`, blob `74c28df`) is byte-identical to the version I passed in job `80e891c1` — no post-PASS mutation. Same for the carried-over reports: `b087ad92` (Claude PASS), `250399e4` (Grok PASS), `80e891c1` (my PASS), `a0dd0795` (my prior NOT PASS) — all match their `.mam/jobs/<id>/*-reports/report-final.md` sources.
- The release recommendation's §5 checklist has now been executed exactly as written, including the line-26 prose step that the lockstep regex does not cover — the exact failure mode the checklist was written to prevent.

## 4. Residual observations (non-blocking)

- **유실 note (carried)**: the pre-existing v4.0.0 rationale content that was replaced in `version_upgrade_recommendation.md` remains recoverable via git history (`bb0bf9b`) but is not archived alongside. Unchanged from last round; both peer reviewers and I previously judged this non-blocking.
- The recommendation doc still carries `[VERDICT: CONSENSUS REACHED — v4.1.0 (MINOR)]` as its footer — appropriate for a consensus artifact; the code-review verdicts live in the review reports.
- `docs/OPENCODE_OLLAMA_GUIDE.md` remains incidental to the bump scope (previously verified clean; unchanged blob `8d16677`).
- Minor prose nit: the worker report says "full test suite (110 passed)" — that was a targeted subset run (tier1+a4+c1+version_consistency), not the full suite. However the *durable* artifacts (VERSIONS.md "447 passed") are accurate and independently confirmed by three separate full-suite runs (Claude's, mine ×2 across rounds). No action needed; noted for the record.

---

## 5. Verdict

The v4.1.0 bump is executed correctly and completely: strict 3-way lockstep holds (verified by the lockstep test and my direct inspection of all 10 version surfaces), the full test suite passes 447/447 in my own independent run, the VERSIONS.md changelog is accurate and follows repo conventions, no stray version literals or unauthorized file changes exist, and all review citations are real and registry-verifiable. The SemVer classification (v4.1.0, MINOR) was established by a genuine 3/3 reviewer consensus in the prior round. No lint, functionality, or data-loss issues found. No redesign needed; no planner escalation.

[VERDICT: PASS]