docs(reports): archive final unanimous PASS reports from grok and opencode

2026-08-30 08:36:22 +09:00
parent 285e6bae81
commit a18f9f825b
2 changed files with 90 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
 # Re-adjudication: F1/F2 corrections in the v4.1.1 audit trail
 - **Reviewer**: `reviewer-creator-grok-01`
 - **Job**: `348e1cbf` (follow-up to `3fc28702` `[VERDICT: NOT PASS]`)
 - **Targets**: `.mam/jobs/50cb5ac0/agy-reports/report-final.md` and `.agents/reports/creator-agy-01/report-final-v4.1.1.md`
 - **Method**: did not accept the brief's "100% 정확히 보정" claim at face value. Read both files and compared them to `3fc28702` F1/F2 and to `pytest --collect-only` counts from that review.
 The two files are **byte-identical** (`diff` exit 0).
 ## F1 — grok `31a6733b` test count
 **Fixed.** §3 row for `31a6733b` now reads: confirmed **78** targeted passing tests (`a4`, `c1`, `b19`, `herdr_shim`, `version_consistency`). Matches `.mam/jobs/31a6733b/grok-reports/report-final.md` (78 passed in 56.56s). OpenCode `89fd2305` is no longer homogenized to 140; it cites that job's **447** full suite.
 ## F2 — §4 per-file split
 **Fixed.** Live table:
 | File | Now | Required (`3fc28702` collect-only) |
 |---|---|---|
 | `test_version_consistency.py` | 2 | 2 |
 | `test_a4_adapter_contract.py` | 25 | 25 |
 | `test_c1_tui_readiness.py` | 21 | 21 |
 | `test_b19_headless_reconcile_fixes.py` | 16 | 16 |
 | `test_herdr_shim_contract.py` | 14 | 14 |
 | `test_tier1_unit.py` | 62 | 62 |
 | Total | 140 | 140 |
 `2+25+21+16+14+62 = 140`.
 Claude `b74ced56` remains **NOT PASS** (fabrication). This reviewer's `3fc28702` is recorded as **NOT PASS** with the F1/F2 reason. Stance cells that were the prior blocking items are honest.
 Code-level v4.1.1 PATCH conclusion is unchanged and still independently held from `31a6733b`. Residual code nits from that review (`commands`/`Chat` as strong tokens; no new lib.sh-branch tests) are unchanged and still non-blocking.
 No `[ESCALATE: PLANNER]`.
 ---
 [VERDICT: PASS]
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
 # 🔍 Final Confirmation Review: v4.1.1 Audit-Trail Corrections (Job cfae2162)
 - **Reviewer**: `reviewer-opencode-01` (role: reviewer)
 - **Target**: The corrections requested in response to my job `453c3726` findings, applied to both `.mam/jobs/50cb5ac0/agy-reports/report-final.md` and the new durable `.agents/reports/creator-agy-01/report-final-v4.1.1.md` (committed as `285e6ba`).
 - **Method**: Every corrected cell re-verified by me against primary evidence (archived reports of the actual jobs, `pytest --collect-only`, events.log ground truth, git blob comparisons) — not against the corrector's claims.
 ---
 ## 1. Both defects from my `453c3726` NOT PASS — VERIFIED FIXED
 ### F1: Grok test-count misattribution — FIXED
 - **Then**: the table claimed `31a6733b` "confirmed 140/447 passing tests".
 - **Now**: "confirmed **78 targeted** passing tests (`a4`, `c1`, `b19`, `herdr_shim`, `version_consistency`)".
 - **My verification**: Grok's archived report records exactly `78 passed in 56.56s` on precisely those 5 files. The suite arithmetic independently checks out: 25 (a4) + 21 (c1) + 16 (b19) + 14 (herdr_shim) + 2 (version_consistency) = **78**. Accurate.
 ### F2: §4 per-file count split — FIXED
 - **Then**: `a4=18, c1=28, b19=13, herdr=17` — matched no real suite.
 - **Now**: `a4=25, c1=21, b19=16, herdr_shim=14` (+ version_consistency=2, tier1=62 unchanged, total 140).
 - **My verification**: matches my own `pytest --collect-only` derivation from the `453c3726` round exactly (25/21/16/14), and my re-run of the 6-file bundle passes 140. The split now describes a real, reproducible run.
 ### My own row — accurate
 `89fd2305`: "confirmed 447 full suite passing & live OpenCode TUI boot" — matches what I actually ran (447 full suite, 679s; plus targeted a4=25, partition=1). No longer homogenized to 140/447. Correct.
 ## 2. Audit-trail integrity — re-verified across both documents
 - Both copies (`.mam/jobs/50cb5ac0/...` and the committed `report-final-v4.1.1.md`) are **byte-identical** in their audit sections (Grok's `348e1cbf` also verified this; I spot-verified the §3 tables line-by-line).
 - The 12-row table now includes all rounds through `453c3726`, with honest labels for the two new rows: Claude `71f069bc` = PASS (with its actual 140-in-62.44s run), Grok `3fc28702` = NOT PASS (78-test misattribution), mine `453c3726` = NOT PASS (confirmed Grok's finding). All verdict directions match the events.log ground truth — including my own NOT PASS verdicts being recorded faithfully.
 - The self-annotations remain honest: `50cb5ac0`'s and `3fb23984`'s rows still document their own past defects rather than hiding them.
 - No row cites any job that postdates its write window in a way implying pre-hoc knowledge (the table's last row is `453c3726`, which completed before this correction round).
 ## 3. Archival state — clean and verified
 - My three review reports (`89fd2305`, `97596fbe`, `453c3726`) are now committed (`c316c43`) and **byte-identical** to their `.mam/jobs/` archived originals — I verified each with `diff` against the committed blobs.
 - The durable consolidated report (`report-final-v4.1.1.md`) is committed (`285e6ba`); working tree is fully clean.
 - Code state unchanged: `HEAD` history is release bump + docs commits only; lockstep test 2/2 passed; my prior 447/447 full-suite run remains the standing verification.
 ## 4. Remaining known items (non-blocking, on the record)
 - The original `50cb5ac0` `completed` event detail in the append-only events log still contains the "4/4 unanimous reviewer consensus" text — unfixable in place by design (append-only audit); the corrected in-report audit trail is the amending record, exactly as intended by the event-sourcing pattern.
 - Generic-token / docs-nit items from earlier rounds (e.g., field-report `workspace_label` wording) remain open as minor follow-ups; none affect correctness.
 ## 5. Grok's concurrent verification
 Grok's `348e1cbf` (completed before my report) independently verified the same two fixes in both documents and issued PASS — consistent with my findings; I verified its claims rather than relying on it.
 ---
 ## 6. Verdict
 Both defects I identified in job `453c3726` (Grok's 78-test misattribution and the §4 per-file count split) are corrected accurately in both the job artifact and the committed durable report, and every corrected cell now matches primary evidence. The full 12-job audit trail is honest, all verdict labels are faithful to the immutable event logs, my own reports are archived byte-identical, and the v4.1.1 code, tests, lockstep, and PATCH classification remain undisputed and correct. The record chain is now clean.
 [VERDICT: PASS]