# 🔍 Cross-Review: Codex Integration — F1 Remediation Round (Job 6e55fa1e)

- **Reviewer**: `reviewer-opencode-01` (role: reviewer)
- **Target**: The same `support-codex` working tree as my job `9cc33e22` NOT PASS, now with the F1 remediation applied (brief's diff was truncated at 221KB/3239 lines — I inspected the working tree directly, as the brief instructed).
- **Method**: F1 remediation verified byte-level against HEAD's Rev.3 content; code state re-confirmed identical to what I fully verified in `9cc33e22` (462/462 full suite); targeted regression re-run this round.

---

## 1. F1 (blocking in `9cc33e22`): OpenCode Rev.3 prior-art clobbering — ALL REMEDIATION ITEMS VERIFIED

My prior NOT PASS required three mechanical fixes (convergent with Grok's `5bfd80b8`). All are applied:

1. **Rev.3 restored to its namespaced path** — `.agents/reports/planner-reviewer-claude-01/plan-de667f0f.md` is now 253 lines: a 3-line `[!NOTE]` header (honestly explaining that the mirror now houses the Codex plan) followed by the **full Rev.3 body, byte-identical to `git show HEAD:.agents/reports/implementation_plan.md`** (249/249 lines, verified programmatically — the only difference is the intentional note header). The OpenCode Rev.3 plan — the executed rationale for the shipped v4.1.0 integration — is durably preserved at the exact path its own Rev.3 changelog convention named.
2. **Codex plan kept at both paths** — `implementation_plan.md` and `plan-e30e3123.md` are byte-identical (verified with `diff`, exit 0). The pairing convention is intact.
3. **Status line synced** — both Codex plan copies now read `**Status**: Implemented (v4.2.0) — full code, tests, and version lockstep present in repo.` — no longer contradicting the tree (the old "Plan only — no code changed" line was stale the moment the implementation landed).

## 2. Code state — unchanged from my full verification in `9cc33e22`

The working-tree code diff vs HEAD is exactly what I fully verified last round (the stat-sheet line-count differences vs the previous brief are base-artifact variance, not new edits — confirmed by inspecting the actual `lib.sh` diff hunks: the same 5 codex touchpoints + version line, nothing more):

- Adapter `codex.py` (verified line-by-line last round: dynamic `state_*.sqlite` glob, DB-first/glob-fallback, `codex delete --force` purge, Class A specs).
- 46-point wiring complete; Class B untouched; flag-tolerant regex landed + regression-locked.
- Lockstep at v4.2.0 MINOR (correct precedent — new agent = v4.1.0 opencode case).
- **Full suite 462/462 in my own run** (`9cc33e22`, 955s) — no code changed since, so that result stands; this round I re-ran the lockstep + a4 contract suites (**31 passed**) and the codex tier-2 lifecycle test (**1 passed**) as spot confirmation.
- The `new_agent_types_roadmap.md` Codex row now correctly reads "Implemented (v4.2.0) / Done" with the verified storage/auth/token facts — the speculative row is superseded as planned.

## 3. Process notes

- The brief's diff was truncated (over the 200KB limit) and explicitly instructed reviewing the working tree directly — done; the file-level summary matched what I found on disk.
- My own `report-9cc33e22.md` appears as an untracked file in this diff — the standard report-archival convention, to be committed with the next docs commit.
- The other new jobs in this window (`e20c098f`, `feb11a70`, `05fa8dd2`) are sandbox worker fixtures, not peer reviews — not cited as evidence.
- Minor observation: the remediation note header in `plan-de667f0f.md` leaves one extra blank line vs HEAD's body — cosmetic, intentional-looking (header separation), immaterial.

## 4. Verdict

The single blocking defect from my `9cc33e22` NOT PASS (and Grok's convergent `5bfd80b8`) is fully and correctly remediated: the OpenCode Rev.3 plan is durably restored at its designated namespaced path (byte-identical body), the Codex plan correctly occupies both its mirror and its own archive path, and the stale Status line is synced. The Codex integration itself was already verified sound last round (462/462 full suite, live CLI ground truth, challenge fixes landed and regression-locked), and spot regression this round confirms nothing regressed. No lint, functionality, or data-loss issues remain; no planner escalation.

[VERDICT: PASS]