# 🔍 Post-Commit Cross-Review: v4.1.3 Release Packaging Commit 85a46ef (Job cb91f486)

- **Reviewer**: `reviewer-opencode-01` (role: reviewer)
- **Target**: Commit `85a46ef` — `chore(release): bump framework and 8 skills to v4.1.3 (PATCH — herdr daemon isolation & Class A 0-turn resume reliability fixes)` — plus the follow-up archive commit `4b2f703`. Brief correctly states "(no changes since base commit)": the work is landed; this is a post-commit audit.
- **Method**: Every checklist item verified by me directly against the committed state — lockstep surfaces, version-consistency tests, reviewer-feedback integration (my own two nits from `71a1b000` were on the record), stray-literal sweep, and behavioral regression run.

---

## 1. Checklist item 1 — 3-Way Version Lockstep: ALL VERIFIED

| Surface | Committed state | My check |
|---|---|---|
| `lib.sh` MAM_VERSION | `"4.1.3"` | **Line 32** — exactly where the assessment *should* have cited it (my prior nit); the packaging commit edited the correct line |
| `VERSIONS.md` header | `v4.1.3`, date `2026-08-31 (KST)` | Verified |
| `VERSIONS.md` prose (line 21) | `v4.1.3`으로 동기화되어 배포 | Verified |
| `VERSIONS.md` matrix | all 8 rows `4.1.3` | Verified |
| `VERSIONS.md` changelog | new `### 🛠️ v4.1.3 — Herdr Daemon Isolation & Class A 0-Turn Resume Reliability Fixes (2026-08-31)` with C-1/C-2 entries | Verified — content matches the pre-agreed draft (assessment §5) and the actual commits: `test_h26`/`test_t14`/`test_t16`/`test_t15` names, Class B preservation statement, 455-test milestone |
| 8× `SKILL.md` frontmatter | all `version: 4.1.3` (create, stop, resume, status, monitor, delegate-job, loop, orc-onboard) | Verified |
| `test_version_consistency.py` | **2 passed** (lockstep + env-override guard), my own run | Verified |
| Stray `4.1.2` literals | none in skills/tests/VERSIONS.md outside historical changelog sections | Verified |
| Regression | `test_version_consistency.py` + `test_uuid_target.py`: **17 passed** (my own run); full-suite 455/455 was verified by me in `8bffb70b` and no test files changed since | Verified |

The v4.1.2 changelog section is preserved intact — no historical 유실.

## 2. Checklist item 2 — Reviewer-feedback integration: BOTH NITS ADDRESSED

My `71a1b000` review (convergent with Grok's `ec2e02e2`) flagged two items for the packaging job. Both were carried into `85a46ef`'s resume SKILL.md edit:

1. **Line 55 body-text sync** — DONE: "If both are empty → for Class A agents (`agy`, `hermes`, `opencode`), `resume_session.sh` automatically falls back to `FRESH_SPAWN=1` (`spawn-spec`). For Class B agents (`claude`, `grok`), fall back to `multi-agent-mux-create`." — accurately describes the shipped behavior (matches the code I verified in `8bffb70b`, gated by the `agy|hermes|opencode` case arm).
2. **Workflow example (lines 71–74)** — PARTIALLY DONE: the comment now says "For Class A, resume_session.sh handles fresh-spawn fallback automatically" and the error message is reworded for Class B, but the example's caller-side `exit 1` still aborts for *all* agents including Class A — for a Class A caller the correct guidance is to just proceed to `resume_session.sh`. Grok (`1acf4fb0`) flagged the same residual. **Non-blocking**: the normative text (line 55) is correct; the example is illustrative, its comment points the right way, and a caller following the actual skill command (`resume_session.sh` directly) never executes this snippet. Recommend a follow-up docs polish to make the example branch on agent class.

## 3. Process integrity

- The assessment → consensus → packaging sequence was honored: assessment (no mutations, `6c24ddd0`), three reviewer opinions (Claude `39439652` PASS, Grok `ec2e02e2` PASS, my `71a1b000` PASS/concur — all archived byte-identical in `4b2f703`, I verified my own archived copy matches my job artifact), then the atomic bump.
- Commit scope is exactly the 10 version surfaces + the resume SKILL.md body sync — no code drift smuggled into the release commit.
- Claude's `39439652` (assessment review) completed **PASS** — the consensus was genuinely 3/3 before packaging.
- Peer verdicts on `85a46ef` itself: Grok `1acf4fb0` **PASS** (same L71-74 nit), agy `47539988` **PASS**; Claude `4d3c2c1c` running at my report time.

## 4. Residual notes (non-blocking)

- The L71-74 example nit (§2.2) — one-line docs polish for a future commit.
- SemVer classification (v4.1.3 PATCH) was established by the 3/3 consensus round and the commit message correctly labels it PATCH.

---

## 5. Verdict

The v4.1.3 release packaging commit is complete and correct: strict 3-way lockstep holds (verified surface-by-surface plus the version-consistency tests), the changelog accurately documents the two Issue #3 fixes with correct test citations and Class B preservation, both reviewer nits from the consensus round were addressed in the packaging (line 55 fully; example partially with a benign residual), no stray literals or unauthorized changes exist, and the regression suite is green in my own runs. The consensus trail (assessment → 3/3 reviewer PASS → atomic bump → archive) is honest end-to-end.

[VERDICT: PASS]