Review round 3 (planner-reviewer-codex-01, reviewer-opencode-01): R1 blocking, R2 and the "ONE builder" wording non-blocking. All three reproduced; none rebutted. R1. _wait_started still returned 0 as soon as the record left `pending`, ahead of the shared predicate, so `error`, `cancelled` and another dispatch's `running` all acknowledged an injection that create's delegate_wait_started rejects - the two contracts the ack-finding brief said must not diverge. Both reviewers reproduced it with the real producer and no record manipulation; my S7n had hidden it by resetting the record to `pending`. The bypass and the console grep are gone. The wrapper's evidence is now delegate_started_recorded alone, the same call create makes. For a remote agent - no shared disk, so no line in events.log - the predicate reads the subscriber's audit record of the `started` it received. That record is attributable by construction: the subscriber verifies the HMAC and drops any event whose data.dispatch_token differs from the job's expected token before it writes anything. The token itself cannot go into the record (the audit redactor masks token-named keys), so the subscriber now stamps a boolean dispatch_verified, and with a token demanded only a verified record counts; an untokened legacy record fails closed. The registry status is never evidence; a terminal job is preserved by the terminal logic, not turned into an acknowledgement. Tests: W1/W2/W3 are the reviewers' three negatives and the positive, real producer, record left exactly as it produced it; W4 runs create's wait and the wrapper's wait side by side on all four and requires the same answer; W5 pins the remote route (a verified record counts, an unverified or non-started one does not); W6 drives the real _Watcher and shows it stamps the flag on a matching started and records nothing for a mismatch; S7n no longer resets the record. test_issue14's "registry ack over unconfirmed inject" produced its ack with a bare status flip - the very bypass - and now produces it the way an agent does, publish_event with the dispatch token; its scenario and every other assertion are unchanged. test_issue18's remote e2e accepted the status messages and now expects the shared one. R2. _code_only blanked a docstring's whole line range, so code sharing that line - `"""doc"""; call()` - vanished from the scan. It now removes only the docstring node from the AST and unparses the rest (comments drop out with it, code strings stay); test_g9b pins the four same-line shapes. The builder comment claimed one builder for create and the wrapper; the wrapper keeps _pub_cmd and S7l pins the two equal argument-for-argument. The comment now says that. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
multi-agent-mux-delegate-job 스킬
작업(Job)을 자율 에이전트(claude-code/hermes/agy/grok-build/codex/opencode/human)에게 위임하고 MQTT
이벤트 채널로 비동기 관찰하는 범용 에이전트 협업 스킬. 시작점은 SKILL.md.
- 프로토콜/스키마:
job-protocol.md - 브로커 PoC→운영 전환:
mqtt-broker-setup.md - 레지스트리 포맷/동시성:
registry.md - 참조 구현:
multi-agent-mux-delegate-job(bash wrapper),scripts/publish_event.py,scripts/job_subscriber.py,scripts/registry.py,scripts/mqtt_common.py - v4.3.0 이후: 위
scripts/*.py는 호환 shim이며 실제 구현은.agents/skills/lib_py/delegation/에 있다 (issue #5 phase 1). 스크립트 경로와 CLI 계약은 그대로이며,lib.sh헬퍼는python -m lib_py.delegation.cli를 호출한다. - 영구 감사 로그:
.mam/delegate_job_logs/<job_id>/(meta.json·events.ndjson·status.json) —multi-agent-mux-delegate-job logs <id>또는multi-agent-mux-delegate-job logs --list로 조회 (SKILL.md "Audit Logs" 참조)