Review R1/N1 (reviewer-grok-01, planner-reviewer-codex-01), reproduced before
fixing. The usage line and SKILL.md both promise "relative to the control
root", but parse_args did Path(...).expanduser().resolve(), which is relative
to the caller's cwd. The runner never chdirs to workspace_root, so the two are
routinely different - the documented recipe runs the loop from the control root
while the source root is a worktree.
Two ways it went wrong: a plan that exists only under the control root was not
found at all (exit 1), and a same-named file in the caller's cwd was loaded
instead, quietly putting an unrelated plan into the first implementation
prompt. That second one is the very failure #25 is about, reintroduced through
the option meant to replace it.
Resolve against workspace_root the way jobs_dir already does (Issue #21 R2);
pathlib's `/` leaves an absolute or expanded-home path untouched. Every earlier
test passed an absolute tmp_path, which is why none of them caught this: P3c
covers both failure modes with the control root away from the caller's cwd, and
P3d pins that absolute and ~ paths are not rewritten.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
GodopuandClaude Opus 5
1e826515cc