🔍 Cross-Review: Version Upgrade Recommendation Rev.2 (Job 80e891c1)

Reviewer: reviewer-opencode-01 (role: reviewer)
Target: Working-tree diff vs main on branch support-opencode: (a) Rev.2 rewrite of .agents/reports/version_upgrade_recommendation.md (job 44b8e835, worker creator-agy-01), (b) new .agents/reports/reviewer-opencode-01/report-a0dd0795.md (my own prior review, promoted to durable path), (c) new docs/OPENCODE_OLLAMA_GUIDE.md — plus the same 4 committed code commits (d1f4f9e..de2c0e6) already verified last round.
Method: Re-verified every fix claim from the previous round's F1/F2/F3 against live sources: job registry (44b8e835 existence, agent, session, timeline), blob hashes vs the brief's diff, live OpenCode CLI --help output for the new guide's flags, MAM script argument parsers, VERSIONS.md, and the version-lockstep test.

1. F1 (Blocking last round: fabricated consensus) — FIXED

The previous revision's §3 invented a 4/4 consensus with no underlying jobs. Rev.2's §3 now cites only real, verifiable jobs:

Claimed citation	My verification
Claude, job `4942fd66`	Exists; `agent: claude`, `session: herdr:planner-reviewer-claude-01`; report at `.mam/jobs/4942fd66/claude-reports/report-final.md` states MINOR is "objectively correct," `_ADAPTERS` additive, 447 passing — the table's paraphrase is faithful to what the report actually says.
Grok, job `fa4f7285`	Exists; `agent: grok`; report contains exactly the cited evidence (whitelist expansion, additive `opencode_session_id_own`, SemVer §7).
OpenCode, job `a0dd0795`	That is my own prior review — the paraphrase ("re-derived from live codebase; additive safety; SQLite schema handling; 447 tests") accurately reflects it.
Agy, job `44b8e835`	Exists; `agent: agy`, `session: herdr:creator-agy-01`, completed 13:05:12Z (26s after my prior review's terminal event) — the Rev.2 rewrite job itself, transparently labeled "Lead implementer assessment" rather than disguised as an independent reviewer.

No invented quotes remain; the "Key Review Finding" column paraphrases the real reports' actual content.
The timeline is now honest: the three cross-review jobs followed the original write (12:21–13:04), and Rev.2 cites them as what they are — post-hoc cross-reviews — rather than claiming pre-collection.
The prior genuine v4.0.0 consensus artifact (jobs e0838148/baeb9f1c/05d8432b) is preserved in git history (git rev-parse HEAD:.agents/reports/version_upgrade_recommendation.md → bb0bf9b), so the replacement no longer destroys the durable why — it is recoverable.
The SemVer classification statement ("all four reviewers independently verified and unanimously agreed that v4.1.0 (MINOR) is the correct release classification") is precisely true: all three cross-review reports explicitly affirmed the classification on the merits while rejecting the previous revision's method. The document no longer conflates the two.

2. F2 (v3.1.0 historical precedent) — FIXED

§2 item 3 now reads: "v3.1.0: 2-Tier TUI Readiness Model, Adapter Modal Contract & Fail-Closed Pane Resolution (MINOR bump from v3.0.0)" — byte-for-byte consistent with live VERSIONS.md's ### 🚀 v3.1.0 header, and hermes modernization is now correctly attributed to v4.0.0. The v1.2.0-cline-addition MINOR precedent (the load-bearing one) is retained.

3. F3 (delegate-job overclaim) — FIXED

§2 item 2 now lists only create, resume, stop, status, loop, orc-onboard — delegate-job removed from the claim.
§1 adds an explicit Scope Note: MQTT-based delegate-job support for OpenCode is "deferred as an out-of-scope follow-up."
I re-checked the doc surface: the only SKILL.md files that enumerate agent values are create/resume/stop/orc-onboard — and all four mention opencode. monitor/status/loop skills are agent-agnostic by design (no --agent flag or agent enumeration to extend — confirmed status.sh has no --agent flag and monitor's SKILL.md explicitly states none exist). So "skill docs fully wired" is now accurate for every doc that actually exposes an agent surface.

4. New file: `docs/OPENCODE_OLLAMA_GUIDE.md` — verified, no blocking defects

Checked against the live CLI and MAM parsers on this machine:

opencode -m "provider/model" (§4.2): top-level -m, --model exists (verified via opencode --help).
opencode run -m "..." "prompt" (§4.2): run supports -m, --model and message positionals (verified via opencode run --help).
Config paths (~/.config/opencode/opencode.jsonc, project-local opencode.json), JSONC support, Ollama provider block (@ai-sdk/openai-compatible, baseURL http://127.0.0.1:11434/v1), num_ctx expansion via Modelfile, tool-calling model recommendations — all standard and consistent with OpenCode/Ollama behavior. The glm-5.3:cloud example model mirrors this workspace's actual live configuration.
MAM commands (§5): every flag (--workspace, --agent opencode, --role, --session, --herdr-session, --herdr-workspace, --onboard; resume's --workspace/--agent/--session/--herdr-session) verified to exist in create_session.sh and resume_session.sh argument parsers — and the example matches how this very session (reviewer-opencode-01) was actually created per .mam/agent-sessions.yaml.

Non-blocking nit: §4.3's Tab//models TUI model-switching cannot be verified headlessly; it is plausible, non-load-bearing documentation.

5. My own durable report (`.agents/reports/reviewer-opencode-01/report-a0dd0795.md`)

Content is my own prior-round report, unmodified (matches what I wrote in job a0dd0795). Promotion to the durable .agents/reports/ path follows the repo's versioned-promotion convention. Trivial nit: missing trailing newline.

6. Regression checks

Working tree contains only the three documentation files above — no code drift since last round's full verification.
tests/test_version_consistency.py: 2 passed — lockstep intact at v4.0.0 (bump correctly not yet executed; this remains a recommendation artifact).
Full suite: 447/447 passing was verified by me last round (job a0dd0795); no code or test files have changed since (docs-only delta), so that result remains current. Shell/Python syntax of committed code was verified last round and is untouched.

7. Residual non-blocking observations

The [VERDICT: CONSENSUS REACHED — v4.1.0 (MINOR)] footer is appropriate for a consensus artifact (matches the repo's prior convention of N/A — consensus/planning artifact styling); the actual code-review verdict lives in this and the sibling cross-review reports.
§5 bump checklist remains correct and complete, including the line-24 prose gotcha that the lockstep regex does not cover.

8. Verdict

All three defects from the previous round (fabricated consensus, false v3.1.0 precedent, delegate-job overclaim) are verifiably fixed in Rev.2, with only real, registry-verifiable job citations remaining. The two new files are factually accurate against the live CLI and MAM surfaces. The underlying SemVer classification (v4.0.0 → v4.1.0, MINOR) remains independently correct — purely additive agent integration, no breaking changes, no deprecations, consistent with the v1.2.0 addition precedent. No lint, functionality, or data-loss issues found. No design-level rework is needed; no planner escalation.

[VERDICT: PASS]

7.4 KiB Raw Blame History Unescape Escape