multi-agent-mux/.agents/reports/planner-reviewer-claude-01/report-8094e244.md

🔍 Cross-Code Review — v4.0.0 Version-Bump Implementation (Job 8094e244)

• Reviewer: planner-reviewer-claude-01
• Target diff: implementation of version_upgrade_recommendation.md Rev.2's §6 checklist — 9 files (lib.sh's MAM_VERSION, 8× SKILL.md frontmatters, VERSIONS.md) plus 1 new report file.
• Method: read every changed file's live post-diff state directly, checked the diff against every specific item Rev.2's §6 required (including the two items added under creator-agy-01's challenge in job ec388212), ran the 3-way lockstep test and the full suite myself.

---

1. Fidelity to Rev.2's §6 Checklist

• Item 1 (lib.sh:32): MAM_VERSION="4.0.0" — confirmed live in the file, matches exactly.
• Item 2, header: **프레임워크 버전**: \v4.0.0`` — done.
• Item 2, line 24 prose (the specific gap creator-agy-01's challenge caught and I required in Rev.2): confirmed live — "...v4.0.0으로 동기화되어 배포됩니다." — correctly updated, not left stale.
• Item 2, 8-row skill matrix table: all 8 cells read 4.0.0.
• Item 2, new ### v4.0.0 changelog section: present, with a ⚠️ 동작 변경 및 마이그레이션 안내 block containing B-1 through B-5. Checked each against my Rev.2 spec:
  • B-1 (what broke) ✅, B-2 (detect-impact grep) ✅ — grep pattern is character-for-character what I specified.
  • B-3 (pre-upgrade --purge-conversation cleanup) ✅ — command matches exactly.
  • B-4 (post-upgrade atomic_dump_yaml YAML-only prune) ✅ — the heredoc mutation snippet is copied verbatim from my Rev.2 text, correctly reusing the existing locked primitive rather than inventing new tooling.
  • Gap: my Rev.2 spec's last bullet — "No forward migration for the adapter itself: git history is the only way to recover adapters/cline.py" — did not make it into B-1…B-5. See Finding 4.1 (minor, non-blocking).
• Item 3 (8× SKILL.md frontmatter): all 8 confirmed at version: 4.0.0 (create, stop, resume, status, monitor, delegate-job, loop, orc-onboard).
• Item 4 (lockstep test): ran tests/test_version_consistency.py myself — 2 passed.
• Item 5 (commit-message convention): not evaluated — no commit exists yet for this diff (working tree only); not applicable to a pre-commit review.

2. Independent Verification (Not Trusting the Diff Text Alone)

• git status --short confirms the live working tree matches the diff shown in the brief exactly — same 9 modified files + 1 untracked report file, no extra changes.
• bash -n .agents/skills/lib.sh — syntactically valid.
• Grepped the whole of VERSIONS.md for residual 3.1.0 mentions: all 3 remaining hits are correctly scoped to past-tense history — one inside my own B-3 instruction text ("v3.1.0 상태에서 ... 실행 전"), and two inside the preserved ### v3.1.0 historical changelog section itself. No stray current-version leakage.
• Ran the full test suite myself (not the diff's own claim): 439 passed in 656.03s (0:10:56), exit code 0. Zero regressions.

3. Finding: Silent Content Loss in the "핵심 아키텍처" Bullet List (유실)

VERSIONS.md's "현재 버전 개요" summary silently dropped the "Atomic Safe Paste Insertion & Preserved Diagnostic Dumps" bullet when the architecture-highlights list was rewritten for v4.0.0. That bullet described a still-live, unmodified feature (pane send-text's single-insertion contract, TUI-not-ready session preservation with exit 0, and .mam/diagnostics/ dump generation on create_session.sh failure/timeout) — nothing in this diff removed or changed that functionality, only its mention in the current-release summary. The only surviving trace of it in the whole document is one incidental sentence inside the historical v3.1.0 changelog body (line 113), not the current-release overview.

This is not a functional regression — the feature itself is untouched and still tested (part of the 439 passing tests) — but it is a real documentation-accuracy loss: a reader consulting "현재 버전 개요" for the current architecture snapshot would no longer see this capability listed, even though it's still part of the shipped system. Recommend re-adding it as a 7th bullet (or folding its description into an adjacent bullet) before this is committed as the release-defining document.

Severity: Low-Moderate, not blocking. Doc-only, no runtime impact, easily fixed in a follow-up edit.

4. Other Findings

4.1 Minor: "no forward migration" note omitted from the B-1…B-5 migration block (Low, not blocking)

My Rev.2 spec's closing bullet ("git history is the only way to recover adapters/cline.py if cline support is ever needed again") isn't present in the implemented B-1…B-5 list. Low severity — informational advisory only, doesn't affect any of the actionable migration steps (detect/pre-upgrade/post-upgrade cleanup are all present and correct), and doesn't create a functional or safety gap. Worth a follow-up touch-up, not blocking.

5. Test Results

.venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/test_version_consistency.py -q
→ 2 passed

.venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/ -q
→ 439 passed in 656.03s (0:10:56), exit code 0

Ran both myself, not taken from the implementation's own claim.

6. Verdict

Every load-bearing item in my Rev.2 checklist — including both corrections creator-agy-01's challenge required — was implemented faithfully and verifiably: the 3-way lockstep holds, the line-24 prose fix and both purge commands are present and byte-accurate, and the full suite is green with zero regressions. One real but non-blocking documentation-completeness finding (a silently dropped architecture bullet describing a still-live feature) and one minor omitted advisory note are flagged for a quick follow-up fix, neither of which affects correctness, the version contract, or any runtime behavior.

[VERDICT: PASS]