Files
multi-agent-mux/.agents/reports/reviewer-opencode-01/report-6e55fa1e.md
T
Godopu 76f10b2096 feat(agent): add full codex agent support (v4.2.0)
- Implement CodexAdapter in lib_py/agents/adapters/codex.py with safe flags and TUI readiness
- Extend create_session, resume_session, stop_session, and reconcile for codex CLI
- Support codex agent delegation and loop integration across all multi-agent skills
- Add unit, component, and contract test suites for codex integration
- Verify all 462 tests passing cleanly
2026-09-05 23:02:29 +09:00

4.3 KiB

🔍 Cross-Review: Codex Integration — F1 Remediation Round (Job 6e55fa1e)

  • Reviewer: reviewer-opencode-01 (role: reviewer)
  • Target: The same support-codex working tree as my job 9cc33e22 NOT PASS, now with the F1 remediation applied (brief's diff was truncated at 221KB/3239 lines — I inspected the working tree directly, as the brief instructed).
  • Method: F1 remediation verified byte-level against HEAD's Rev.3 content; code state re-confirmed identical to what I fully verified in 9cc33e22 (462/462 full suite); targeted regression re-run this round.

1. F1 (blocking in 9cc33e22): OpenCode Rev.3 prior-art clobbering — ALL REMEDIATION ITEMS VERIFIED

My prior NOT PASS required three mechanical fixes (convergent with Grok's 5bfd80b8). All are applied:

  1. Rev.3 restored to its namespaced path — .agents/reports/planner-reviewer-claude-01/plan-de667f0f.md is now 253 lines: a 3-line [!NOTE] header (honestly explaining that the mirror now houses the Codex plan) followed by the full Rev.3 body, byte-identical to git show HEAD:.agents/reports/implementation_plan.md (249/249 lines, verified programmatically — the only difference is the intentional note header). The OpenCode Rev.3 plan — the executed rationale for the shipped v4.1.0 integration — is durably preserved at the exact path its own Rev.3 changelog convention named.
  2. Codex plan kept at both paths — implementation_plan.md and plan-e30e3123.md are byte-identical (verified with diff, exit 0). The pairing convention is intact.
  3. Status line synced — both Codex plan copies now read **Status**: Implemented (v4.2.0) — full code, tests, and version lockstep present in repo. — no longer contradicting the tree (the old "Plan only — no code changed" line was stale the moment the implementation landed).

2. Code state — unchanged from my full verification in 9cc33e22

The working-tree code diff vs HEAD is exactly what I fully verified last round (the stat-sheet line-count differences vs the previous brief are base-artifact variance, not new edits — confirmed by inspecting the actual lib.sh diff hunks: the same 5 codex touchpoints + version line, nothing more):

  • Adapter codex.py (verified line-by-line last round: dynamic state_*.sqlite glob, DB-first/glob-fallback, codex delete --force purge, Class A specs).
  • 46-point wiring complete; Class B untouched; flag-tolerant regex landed + regression-locked.
  • Lockstep at v4.2.0 MINOR (correct precedent — new agent = v4.1.0 opencode case).
  • Full suite 462/462 in my own run (9cc33e22, 955s) — no code changed since, so that result stands; this round I re-ran the lockstep + a4 contract suites (31 passed) and the codex tier-2 lifecycle test (1 passed) as spot confirmation.
  • The new_agent_types_roadmap.md Codex row now correctly reads "Implemented (v4.2.0) / Done" with the verified storage/auth/token facts — the speculative row is superseded as planned.

3. Process notes

  • The brief's diff was truncated (over the 200KB limit) and explicitly instructed reviewing the working tree directly — done; the file-level summary matched what I found on disk.
  • My own report-9cc33e22.md appears as an untracked file in this diff — the standard report-archival convention, to be committed with the next docs commit.
  • The other new jobs in this window (e20c098f, feb11a70, 05fa8dd2) are sandbox worker fixtures, not peer reviews — not cited as evidence.
  • Minor observation: the remediation note header in plan-de667f0f.md leaves one extra blank line vs HEAD's body — cosmetic, intentional-looking (header separation), immaterial.

4. Verdict

The single blocking defect from my 9cc33e22 NOT PASS (and Grok's convergent 5bfd80b8) is fully and correctly remediated: the OpenCode Rev.3 plan is durably restored at its designated namespaced path (byte-identical body), the Codex plan correctly occupies both its mirror and its own archive path, and the stale Status line is synced. The Codex integration itself was already verified sound last round (462/462 full suite, live CLI ground truth, challenge fixes landed and regression-locked), and spot regression this round confirms nothing regressed. No lint, functionality, or data-loss issues remain; no planner escalation.

[VERDICT: PASS]