MAM_WAIT_GRACE_S silently fell back to 300 on anything but bare digits
(" 30 " too), MAM_CHILD_WAIT_S went through float() (abc raised ValueError,
0.5 and 1e3 were taken) and MAM_JOB_TREE_MAX through int() (abc and an
empty value raised). All three now go through runner._int_knob, which is
_positive_int's rule (PR #43 review grok): decimal, blanks around allowed,
an invalid value warns once and the default is used. Minimums:
MAM_WAIT_GRACE_S >= 0 (wait exactly the budget), MAM_CHILD_WAIT_S >= 0
(look once; test_issue34 uses 0), MAM_JOB_TREE_MAX >= 1 (a cap of 0 calls
every tree "over"; not waiting is MAM_CHILD_WAIT_S=0).
The loop SKILL.md now names MAM_WAIT_GRACE_S in the budget row and the
sub-job paragraph (PR #41 M6), with the knobs' integer rules.
Tests: RUNNER_INT_KNOBS in test_issue26_ints.py holds the minimums; the
real wait_for_descendants is driven per knob, and a static check ties the
call-site minimums to the table (15 of the new cases fail at 0051fd6; the
14 that pass are valid values whose result did not change).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HCGpJXhSZasJLU38ksDghe
GodopuandClaude Opus 5.5
8b046390be