Fixes the sentences the four design reviews flagged and records what phase 1
actually implements: status line, monitor-topic scope, option A's isolation
and capacity wording, creator/reviewer ownership (tests write; promotion is
the control root's), the control-plane binding persisted and forwarded, two
loop recipes ((a) the loop implements, (b) the base recorded before an
out-of-loop implementation, then --base --review-only; no base in --task),
the loop lock as a refusal, "phase 1 = parallel implementation, one review
loop", the eight Issue #21 items with their status, and a new section 7 with
root definitions and a per-skill compatibility table. The review files are
unchanged. The loop SKILL.md lock note names the lock branch instead of line
numbers that moved.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017R3Eg7MEpSWnm1oB9ZPP6G
GodopuandClaude Opus 5
b61c8b177a