2.1 KiB
2.1 KiB
📋 Review & Opinion on CLI Option Redesign Proposal (Job 10a3201c)
- Reviewer: planner-reviewer-claude-01
- Job ID: 10a3201c
- Role: Planner & Reviewer
- Target Proposal: CLI Option Redesign (
--creator,--planner,--reviewer)
1. Executive Summary & Verdict
- Verdict: STRONGLY ENDORSED (100% PASS)
- Rationale: The proposal resolves an asymmetry in the CLI design where the three fundamental roles were represented inconsistently (
--target-agentvs--planvs--reviewer). Transitioning to--creator,--planner, and--reviewerprovides high ergonomic clarity and intuitive alignment with the architecture.
2. Key Architectural Strengths
-
Role Symmetry (3-Tier Alignment):
--planner <name>: Explicitly binds the Planner session and implicitly setsPLAN_MODE=true.--creator <name>: Explicitly binds the primary Creator session.--reviewer "A,B"/--all-reviewer: Binds the Reviewer pool.
-
Zero-Breaking-Change Guarantee:
- Preserving
--target-agentas an alias for--creatorguarantees complete backward compatibility for all existing scripts, tests, and wrapper invocations.
- Preserving
-
Multi-Agent Disambiguation:
- In environments with multiple running Planner-capable agents (e.g. Claude + Grok + AGY),
--planner <name>eliminates ambiguity and allows precise orchestration targeting.
- In environments with multiple running Planner-capable agents (e.g. Claude + Grok + AGY),
3. Recommended Edge Case Defenses for Implementation
- Flag Mutual Consistency: If both
--creator <name1>and--target-agent <name2>are provided with conflicting names,run_loop.shshould fail-fast with a clear validation error. - Implicit
--planHandling: Providing--planner <session>should automatically setPLAN_MODE=true, but passing--planner <session>while simultaneously passing a hypothetical--no-planshould be rejected as contradictory. - Session Liveness Validation: When
--planner <session>is explicitly supplied,run_loop.shshould verify that the specified session exists and hasstatus: runninginagent-sessions.yaml.
[VERDICT: PASS]