multi-agent-mux/.agents/reports/canary-projects-multi-agent-mux-reviewer-cline/report-markdown-analysis.md

Workspace Root Markdown Files Analysis Report

• Reviewer: Reviewer Cline (canary-projects-multi-agent-mux-reviewer-cline, role: reviewer)
• Date: 2026-07-11
• Brief: .mam/reports/brief-root-markdowns.md
• Scope: 7 root markdown files — purpose, status, KEEP/DELETE verdict

---

Summary Verdict Table

#	File	Purpose	Status	Verdict
1	task.md	Task checklist for "deploy URL parameterization" (Rev.1)	Obsolete — work shipped in commit 6408f4a, checkboxes never updated	DELETE
2	implementation_plan.md	Implementation plan for "deploy URL parameterization" (Rev.1)	Obsolete — superseded by shipped commit 6408f4a	DELETE
3	BOOTSTRAP.md	Setup & verification guide for new agents	Active — referenced by README.md, in deploy/install.sh doc-allowlist	KEEP
4	FUTURE_WORKS.ko.md	Korean roadmap of pending improvement items	Active — open items FW-P1P7/W1W7/D2~D4; maintained KO mirror of FUTURE_WORKS.md	KEEP
5	DONE.md	Completed-tasks tracker (FW-01~FW-W3, verified 2026-06-21)	Static historical record — referenced by FUTURE_WORKS.md; in deploy/install.sh skip-list	KEEP
6	session_isolation_discussion.md	Rev.3 discussion doc for session ID isolation	Superseded — single source of truth moved to implementation_plan.session_isolation.md; work is DONE (reviewed PASS)	DELETE
7	AGENTS.md	Core behavioral guidelines for all agents	Active & essential — installed by install_mam.sh, referenced everywhere	KEEP

---

Detailed Analysis

1. task.md — DELETE ❌

• Purpose: Task checklist (Rev.1) for the "배포 스크립트 URL 파라미터화" (deploy URL parameterization) effort. References implementation_plan.md as its base document.
• Current Status: Obsolete. All checkboxes remain [ ] unchecked, but the work it describes has been shipped: commit 6408f4a feat(deploy): parameterize distribution URLs via MAM_*_URL env vars implements exactly T1–T4 of this checklist. Verified in code:
  • deploy/install.sh:57 → REPO_URL="${MAM_REPO_URL:-https://...}" (T1 ✅)
  • deploy/install.sh:58 → ARCHIVE_URL="${MAM_ARCHIVE_URL:-https://...}" (T1 ✅)
  • deploy/update.sh:139 → INSTALLER_URL="${MAM_INSTALLER_URL:-https://...}" (T2 ✅)
  • .env.example:84-97 → all 3 variables documented (T3 ✅)
  • The commit message matches the plan's §6 proposed commit message verbatim.
• Verdict: DELETE. Stale planning artifact for completed work. The checkboxes were never updated, leaving a misleading impression of incomplete work. The shipped commit + .env.example are the real records of completion.
• Pre-deletion check: no inbound references from README.md, deploy/install.sh, or any active code. Safe to delete. (.agents/multi_agent_workflow.md mentions task.md generically as a workflow convention, not this specific file.)

2. implementation_plan.md — DELETE ❌

• Purpose: Implementation plan (Rev.1) for the same "deploy URL parameterization" effort, by Planner Agent dated 2026-07-09, status "Draft (사용자 승인 대기)".
• Current Status: Obsolete. Same as task.md — the plan was executed and shipped in commit 6408f4a. The plan's §3.1/§3.2 code snippets match the current deploy/install.sh/update.sh line-for-line. Its status line still says "Draft (사용자 승인 대기)" which is no longer accurate.
• Verdict: DELETE. Stale planning artifact for completed work, paired with task.md. The shipped commit is the authoritative record.
• Pre-deletion check: no inbound references from README.md or active code. The only cross-reference is from task.md (also being deleted). Safe to delete.

3. BOOTSTRAP.md — KEEP ✅

• Purpose: Setup & initialization guide for new agents/developers adopting the MAM workflow — scaffolding overview, .env configuration, directory/security audit, and bootstrap verification tests.
• Current Status: Active. Referenced by README.md:177 (root file-tree listing) and README.md:186 ("For detailed setup instructions, please consult the BOOTSTRAP.md file"). Listed in deploy/install.sh:131 doc-allowlist (MESSAGING.md BOOTSTRAP.md BOOTSTRAP.ko.md AGENTS.md) — intentionally shipped to installed targets. Has a Korean mirror BOOTSTRAP.ko.md (same bilingual convention as MULTI_AGENT_RULES.md/.ko.md).
• Verdict: KEEP. Active onboarding document, referenced from two authoritative surfaces (README, installer), part of the shipped doc set.

4. FUTURE_WORKS.ko.md — KEEP ✅

• Purpose: Korean-language roadmap tracking pending improvement candidates (portability, concurrency, workflow, deployment hardening).
• Current Status: Active. Contains open items: FW-P1P7, FW-W1W7, FW-D2~D4 (all unchecked). Last updated 2026-06-24. One item struck through as resolved (FW-D1, 2026-06-24). This is the maintained Korean mirror of FUTURE_WORKS.md (same timestamp 2026-06-26 21:27, parallel bilingual convention) — NOT a stale backup.
• Verdict: KEEP. Living roadmap document with open work items; part of the repo's bilingual doc convention.
• Note: the header says "완료된 항목은 DONE.ko.md를 참조" — DONE.ko.md exists, so the cross-reference is valid.

5. DONE.md — KEEP ✅

• Purpose: Completed-tasks tracker recording FW-01 ~ FW-16, FW-L1L3, FW-N1N7, FW-W3 (28 items), verified by three agents (agy-new, agy-existing, claude-existing) on 2026-06-21.
• Current Status: Static historical record. All items complete and verified — this is a closed ledger, not a stale plan. Referenced by FUTURE_WORKS.md:4 ("For completed items, see DONE.md") as the completion counterpart to the roadmap. Explicitly named in deploy/install.sh:130 as a dev-doc intentionally skipped during install ("We skip dev-specific docs like README.md, DONE.md, and FUTURE_WORKS.md").
• Verdict: KEEP. Not an obsolete plan — a permanent audit record of what was done, cross-referenced by the active roadmap. Deleting it would orphan FUTURE_WORKS.md's "see DONE.md" pointer and lose the verification history (which agents verified what, with which commit SHAs).

6. session_isolation_discussion.md — DELETE ❌

• Purpose: Rev.3 "단일 격리 디렉터리 통합본" — the integrated discussion/design doc for session ID isolation, consolidating earlier L1/L2 hybrid drafts.
• Current Status: Superseded. The single source of truth moved to implementation_plan.session_isolation.md (Rev.3), which lists this file as "관련 자료" (related material) — i.e., the dedicated plan is canonical, the discussion is the predecessor. The implementation is DONE and reviewed PASS (I verified this in my prior session-isolation review: commits 768cfe5, dad99f5; T1–T6 + RK2 + T6 all PASS). The file's §5 still says "⏭️ 승인에 따라 Phase 0... 착수합니다" (proceeding to Phase 0), but Phase 0–4 are all complete.
• Verdict: DELETE. Superseded discussion draft. The canonical design lives in implementation_plan.session_isolation.md, task tracking in task.session_isolation.md, and the completed implementation in the codebase + my PASS review report. Keeping it creates a stale duplicate source of truth that could mislead future agents into thinking the work is still in progress.
• Pre-deletion check: inbound references exist only from historical reviewer briefs under .agents/reports/.../brief-isolation-review.md (audit trail, already completed) and from implementation_plan.session_isolation.md/task.session_isolation.md (which link to it as "관련 자료" for historical provenance — those dedicated docs are self-sufficient). No active code or README.md references it. Safe to delete; the audit trail in .agents/reports/ preserves the review history.

7. AGENTS.md — KEEP ✅

• Purpose: Core behavioral guidelines for all LLM coding agents (Think Before Coding, Simplicity First, Surgical Changes, Goal-Driven Execution). The repo's primary agent-behavior contract.
• Current Status: Active & essential. Referenced by MULTI_AGENT_RULES.md note, BOOTSTRAP.md:184 (onboarding points agents to it), install_mam.sh (copies it to target project roots with marker-injection protection). It's the first file any agent is instructed to read.
• Verdict: KEEP. Foundational, actively enforced, non-negotiable.

---

Deletion Risk Assessment (for the 3 DELETE candidates)

File	Inbound refs from active code/README?	Inbound refs from audit trail only?	Safe to delete?
task.md	None (only implementation_plan.md, also being deleted)	No	✅ Yes
implementation_plan.md	None (only task.md, also being deleted)	No	✅ Yes
session_isolation_discussion.md	None from active code/README	Yes (implementation_plan.session_isolation.md, task.session_isolation.md, reviewer briefs)	✅ Yes — audit trail preserved in .agents/reports/; the dedicated plan is self-sufficient

Recommendation: Delete the 3 files in a single atomic commit, e.g. chore(docs): remove obsolete completed-plan and superseded discussion drafts. The deletion is safe — no active code or README references them, and the audit trail (review reports, shipped commits, dedicated plan docs) fully preserves the history.

---

Final Statement

Of the 7 root markdown files analyzed, 3 are safe to delete (task.md, implementation_plan.md, session_isolation_discussion.md) — all are stale planning artifacts for work that has been completed, shipped, and reviewed PASS. The remaining 4 should be kept (BOOTSTRAP.md, FUTURE_WORKS.ko.md, DONE.md, AGENTS.md) — they are either active/referenced documents or permanent audit records. No active code paths or authoritative documentation reference the 3 deletion candidates; deleting them removes misleading "in-progress" signals without losing any history.