Two reviewers raised five defects. Every one was reproduced here before being
accepted; none were rebutted.
F-A (claude, blocking) -- the CAS table had no row for two transitions the
wrapper legitimately makes, so `submit --type loop|discuss` silently stopped
working by default: the per-iteration re-dispatch was refused and its metadata
discarded, the exhausted-budget finalisation was refused, and the CLI returned 0
both times. Reproduced against the real modules. Fixed by naming those
transitions rather than carving an exception: `redispatch` and `finalize` are
requests gated on operator authority, so the wrapper can move a finished record
while an agent still cannot touch its own terminal. A re-dispatch must advance
the iteration, so a replay cannot resurrect a job. The operator CLI now exits
non-zero with a reason when a write is refused -- the silence is what let this
hide.
F-B (claude) -- moving the audit mirror out of the lock made status.json
last-writer-wins, so a slow flush could leave it behind the registry. It now
carries transition_seq and skips a write that would go backwards, restoring the
sequential consistency the lock used to provide for free.
R1 (codex, blocking) -- the policy called attribution with only the dispatch
record, so it proved the record was well-formed and never confronted the
identifiers the evidence carried. A finalized scenario with a different session,
a different attempt and a manifest from another attempt was still approved.
Observed identifiers are now collected from the timeline and every one must
agree; a manifest belonging to another attempt holds. Collecting every
occurrence rather than the first matters, because taking the first would drop
exactly the contradicting value this is meant to catch.
R2 (codex, blocking) -- a supplied expected_attempt was ignored when the record
had no attempt field, so a compare-and-swap with nothing to compare committed.
It now fails closed, which matters because 2b plans to gate inferred completion
on precisely that precondition.
R3 (codex) -- a status could ride in as an ordinary field, so `progress` could
commit a terminal from inside the boundary that exists to prevent it. Status is
now settable only by the request that owns it, unknown requests are refused, and
pending has an owning request instead of being an untyped merge.
Each of the eleven new regressions was checked against the pre-fix code first.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UrDNJkHmm18uu7n7JwV5Qd
engine.transition is now the only writer of job status. It implements the target
table in state-transitions.md §3: claim, non-terminal metadata, explicit
terminals, idempotent re-receipt, refusal of conflicting or late signals with an
audit entry, stale-attempt rejection, and deadline timeout.
Two write paths become one. update_job_status merged fields unconditionally;
pick_pending hand-rolled a correct pending->running swap plus its own audit
mirror. Neither was wrong alone, but a rule added to one silently missed the
other, which is the shape that produced the phase 1 transport bugs. Both keep
their signatures and their preserved legacy bodies behind MAM_ENGINE_CAS=0.
A merged `status` value is routed to the request that owns it, so a raw field
write can no longer slip past the table. Getting that wrong first was caught by
the characterization tests: a metadata merge was overwriting the caller's status
with the pre-merge value.
Lock discipline is now enforced, not described. The lock covers a decision and
one record write; audit mirroring is queued and flushed after release, carrying a
monotonic transition_seq so ordering survives the move. A test watches for
subprocess, socket and sleep calls while the lock is held and asserts none.
Structural correction to my own plan, caught by a phase 1 guard: the plan put the
engine in lib_py/loop, but delegation would then have had to import a sibling,
which is exactly what mixes trees under a frozen loop. The engine belongs with
the registry writers, so it lives in lib_py/delegation and loop consumes it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UrDNJkHmm18uu7n7JwV5Qd
GodopuandClaude Opus 5