Commit Graph
3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
GodopuandClaude Opus 5.5 8b47cc76ee test(issue-17): every test that sources lib.sh does it under its own WORKSPACE_ROOT (review grok, codex)
d198dd5 fixed one helper; the same defect was in eleven more modules
(reviews grok and codex R1/R2): their shells inherited the process
environment, so each `source lib.sh` rewrote <WORKSPACE_ROOT>/.mam/shim/herdr
- the checkout's own when the variable is unset or names this checkout (which
pytest_configure keeps), another workspace's under --noconftest.

- conftest: own_workspace_root, an opt-in fixture setting WORKSPACE_ROOT to
  <tmp_path>/.mam-test-state/workspace. Not autouse: runner.py and
  mqtt_common read WORKSPACE_ROOT in-process, and some tests unset it on
  purpose. mam_sandbox and explicit envs run later and still win.
- pytestmark usefixtures("own_workspace_root") in test_version_consistency,
  test_b19_headless_reconcile_fixes, test_b8_send_keys_verification,
  test_issue6_fail_closed, test_loop_cli, test_issue5_phase3_loop,
  test_issue5_phase4_runtime, test_o3_scoped_guard, test_issue25_plan_reuse,
  test_orc_onboard (their shells inherit os.environ, many with no env at all).
- test_orc_onboard (R2): SCRUBBED_ENV is taken at import and no longer
  carries WORKSPACE_ROOT; every call builds _scrubbed_env(root) with the root
  of the call (ws / cwd / mam_sandbox, else this test's).
- test_workspace_scope (unittest) and test_issue21_worktree_prereqs._mutate
  pin the root they already create.

Tests (test_issue17_workspace_root_isolation.py): W1 copies the checkout and
runs one test of each of those modules there with WORKSPACE_ROOT naming the
copy - the copy gets no .mam; W2 imports test_orc_onboard under a sentinel
root, then calls it under another - the sentinel stays empty. At d198dd5 both
fail (the copy gets .mam/shim/herdr; the sentinel gets it).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HCGpJXhSZasJLU38ksDghe
2026-10-09 00:22:54 +09:00
GodopuandClaude Opus 5 1e826515cc fix(issue-25): a relative --plan-file is taken against the control root, as its usage line says
Review R1/N1 (reviewer-grok-01, planner-reviewer-codex-01), reproduced before
fixing. The usage line and SKILL.md both promise "relative to the control
root", but parse_args did Path(...).expanduser().resolve(), which is relative
to the caller's cwd. The runner never chdirs to workspace_root, so the two are
routinely different - the documented recipe runs the loop from the control root
while the source root is a worktree.

Two ways it went wrong: a plan that exists only under the control root was not
found at all (exit 1), and a same-named file in the caller's cwd was loaded
instead, quietly putting an unrelated plan into the first implementation
prompt. That second one is the very failure #25 is about, reintroduced through
the option meant to replace it.

Resolve against workspace_root the way jobs_dir already does (Issue #21 R2);
pathlib's `/` leaves an absolute or expanded-home path untouched. Every earlier
test passed an absolute tmp_path, which is why none of them caught this: P3c
covers both failure modes with the control root away from the caller's cwd, and
P3d pins that absolute and ~ paths are not rewritten.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-21 05:17:50 +00:00
GodopuandClaude Opus 5 a334083760 test(issue-25): plan reuse is explicit only and empty plan reports are not silent (P1-P11)
P1 is the reproduction: a running planner plus a promoted plan in its report
directory must not reach the Creator. P2 pins that a named plan is used, that
the newer unrelated one is not, and that the plan rides only the first
implementation prompt - the correction round carries feedback alone, as the
implicit load did too. P3-P5 keep the option's checks in front of any job.
P6 keeps --plan mode and its promotion working.

P9-P11 cover the loads the review widened: an empty initial plan stops the run,
an empty discussion refine keeps the previous plan, and an empty escalation
refine leaves the "follow the updated plan below" prompt carrying the real one.
The existing _drive helpers hand every job the same non-empty PASS report and
so cannot reach these paths at all, so this module drives the loop with its own
stub that scripts a report per job. P7-P8 pin wrapper/runner parity, the legacy
shell refusal, and that neither implementation globs for a plan any more.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-21 03:26:44 +00:00