Commit Graph
8 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
GodopuandClaude Opus 5 c7c559b7aa fix(issue-21): reviews 8f141362 N1 and 275fdc4f R4/R5 - clean refusal for a broken worktree, no init over existing files, check retained submodule repositories
- N1 (planner-reviewer-claude-01) worktree_remove.sh: when `git status` fails
  in the worktree (e.g. its directory was deleted), judge_tree returned before
  METHOD was set and the summary line died under set -u with exit 1. METHOD
  now has its default before the function; the refusal is exit 3 with
  "nothing was changed", plus a `git worktree prune` hint when the directory
  is gone. Same for --dry-run.
- R4 (planner-reviewer-codex-01) worktree_prepare.sh: a submodule path that is
  not initialised yet but already holds files made the clone fail, and the
  rollback's `deinit -f` then deleted those files. --submodules now refuses
  such a path up front (new exit 3, nothing changed), which also makes the
  rollback's premise true: after a failed attempt, everything under a
  not-yet-initialised path was created by that attempt.
- R5 (planner-reviewer-codex-01) lib_py/worktree.py: `submodule foreach`
  visits initialised checkouts only, but a deinit'd submodule keeps its
  repository - stash and unpushed commits included - under the worktree's
  modules/, which the forced removal deletes. Every repository under modules/
  (nested ones included) is now checked directly (`--git-dir`): commits on no
  remote (HEAD included) and refs/stash with its reflog. A directory that looks
  like a partial repository cannot be checked and refuses.
- Also: the rollback loops are C-style (`seq 0 -1` counts down on BSD), and
  prepare warns that --base is ignored for an existing branch.

Tests W6i (deleted worktree directory, with and without --dry-run), W6j and
W6j2 (stash / unpushed commit in a deinit'd submodule's repository) and W6k
(existing files in an uninitialised submodule path). Skill docs and the design
doc describe the new refusal and the wider repository check.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017R3Eg7MEpSWnm1oB9ZPP6G
2026-09-14 18:14:13 +00:00
GodopuandClaude Opus 5 bbbbb95ef6 fix(issue-21): review ffb5055e R1-R3 - re-check the tree after --stop, refuse submodule stashes, roll a partial submodule init back to a usable checkout
Review ffb5055e (planner-reviewer-codex-01):

- R1 [P1] worktree_remove.sh: the clean-tree and submodule checks ran only
  before --stop, so work a stopping session wrote (or committed, or stashed)
  was deleted by the forced removal. The checks are one function now, run
  before any change and again right before the removal; any finding then
  refuses with exit 3 (sessions already stopped, worktree kept), and the
  removal method follows that latest look.
- R2 [P1] lib_py/worktree.py: a submodule stash is reachable from no branch
  and leaves the status clean, and the forced removal deletes the worktree's
  own submodule repositories. `git stash list` in every submodule is a
  separate finding (`stashes`), refused like dirty/unpushed; errors fail
  closed as before.
- R3 [P2] worktree_prepare.sh: when one submodule cloned and a later one
  failed, the rollback deleted modules/ while the cloned checkout's .git file
  still pointed into it, and `git status` failed in the worktree. The rollback
  now undoes only this attempt: each submodule whose git dir did not exist
  before is deinitialised before its git dir is deleted; submodules
  initialised earlier are kept; shared submodule.* config values are restored
  exactly (new keys removed, pre-existing values put back - init and deinit
  both write .git/config). A final `git status` either confirms a usable
  checkout or prints what to inspect.

Tests W6e (a write during stop keeps the worktree and the file), W6f (a
submodule stash refuses), W6g (partial failure on a fresh worktree: usable,
no modules/, no new config, then prepare and a plain removal work) and W6h (a
failing retry keeps the earlier `sm` init and its config value). The skill
docs and the design doc describe the recheck, the stash rule and the scoped
rollback.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017R3Eg7MEpSWnm1oB9ZPP6G
2026-09-14 16:57:39 +00:00
GodopuandClaude Opus 5 7988db9adf docs(issue-21): item 4 helpers, the submodule removal rule and the resume cwd rule in the design doc, compatibility matrix and skill docs
- design doc §3: the hand-assembled worktree/.venv/create recipe is replaced by
  worktree_prepare.sh --creator-agent (its BASE= line is the base to record);
  cleanup is worktree_remove.sh --stop; resume needs the original path.
- §4: what the helpers do - no .mam.env copy, the shared info/exclude, opt-in
  submodules (any init leaves modules/, which blocks a plain remove), removal
  of submodule worktrees with one --force after the checks, and never by hand.
- §5: item 4 is loop A on this branch; phase-1 items are done in v4.6.0.
- §7: create (control-root reconcile/watchdog, loud binding failure), resume
  (original cwd only, binding persisted when already running), stop (the
  removal helper's checks), monitor (register via create/prepare only).
- create / stop / resume SKILL.md: usage and exit codes of worktree_prepare.sh
  and worktree_remove.sh, the original-cwd rule and its exit code (1 -> 2).
  Frontmatter versions are unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017R3Eg7MEpSWnm1oB9ZPP6G
2026-09-14 15:26:37 +00:00
GodopuandClaude Fable 5.1 d34b532ccf release(v4.6.0): bump framework and eight skills to 4.6.0 in lockstep; archive PR #22 merge-side reviews
Issue #21 phase-1 prerequisites (PR #22) add loop runner options and the
control-plane module: MINOR. VERSIONS.md gains the v4.6.0 entry, the
archived design reviews lose their markdown trailing whitespace so
`git diff --check` is clean, and the three merge-side PASS reports
(claude, agy, codex @ 4a81d15) are archived under .agents/reports/.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VCgu9Fa9iT7TbJUSzdq4Ff
2026-09-14 21:53:51 +09:00
GodopuandClaude Opus 5 af8a54c028 fix(issue-21): review R1-R3 - no env as agent arguments on a reused pane, one jobs dir for a relative MAM_JOBS_DIR, stop keeps the audit-log root
Review 9a1adb46 (planner-reviewer-codex-01):

- R1 [P1] lib.sh new-session: a forwarded binding reached the agent as
  arguments. With env flags the idle-pane branch prefixed `env K=V ...` to
  the command that `herdr agent start ... --kind <agent> -- <args>` passes to
  the agent executable. An idle pane is now reused only when no environment
  has to be set; otherwise the pane is created by pane split / workspace
  create, which take --env. The dead `env` prefix code is removed (its
  send-text fallback would have typed the same line).
- R2 [P2] runner: a relative MAM_JOBS_DIR is resolved once against the
  control root, the way the wrapper (cwd=workspace_root) reads it, and that
  absolute dir is used for delegation, wait, report lookup and cleanup.
- R3 [P2] stop: the row's control_plane.delegate_job_logs_dir is restored
  (exported unless the caller set DELEGATE_JOB_LOGS_DIR), so the
  cancellation history lands in the row's audit-log root.

Tests: T3-1 and T3-3 now assert that the binding arrives as --env on the
pane-creation calls and that no env/K=V token follows `--` in agent start
(fresh and reused pane); T3-4c (audit root on stop) and T2-15 (relative
MAM_JOBS_DIR) are new. The design doc's compatibility table and a create
comment no longer describe the removed idle-pane env path.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017R3Eg7MEpSWnm1oB9ZPP6G
2026-09-14 05:00:02 +00:00
GodopuandClaude Opus 5 b61c8b177a docs(issue-21): correct the worktree design doc - partial support, phase-1 review-only flow, compatibility matrix
Fixes the sentences the four design reviews flagged and records what phase 1
actually implements: status line, monitor-topic scope, option A's isolation
and capacity wording, creator/reviewer ownership (tests write; promotion is
the control root's), the control-plane binding persisted and forwarded, two
loop recipes ((a) the loop implements, (b) the base recorded before an
out-of-loop implementation, then --base --review-only; no base in --task),
the loop lock as a refusal, "phase 1 = parallel implementation, one review
loop", the eight Issue #21 items with their status, and a new section 7 with
root definitions and a per-skill compatibility table. The review files are
unchanged. The loop SKILL.md lock note names the lock branch instead of line
numbers that moved.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017R3Eg7MEpSWnm1oB9ZPP6G
2026-09-14 03:34:48 +00:00
GodopuandClaude Fable 5.1 dcf2fab06e docs(design): archive the four design reviews of the worktree operating model
claude, agy, grok: PASS with amendments; codex: NOT PASS (recipe overstates
current env-override support; review identity and lifecycle ownership
underspecified). Direction (creator per worktree, shared reviewer pool)
agreed by all four.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VCgu9Fa9iT7TbJUSzdq4Ff
2026-09-14 11:14:07 +09:00
GodopuandClaude Fable 5.1 fe96db1d96 docs(design): propose the worktree operating model - creator per worktree, shared reviewer pool
Design proposal for review (no code change): why the checkout-path
workspace assumption blocks parallel issues and caused the #18 checkout
switch, three candidate models, the recommended hybrid (writers isolated
per worktree, readers shared, one .mam control plane via env overrides),
how it maps onto today's scripts, what has to change, and the questions
put to the reviewers.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VCgu9Fa9iT7TbJUSzdq4Ff
2026-09-14 10:10:49 +09:00