Issue #21 phase-1 prerequisites (PR #22) add loop runner options and the
control-plane module: MINOR. VERSIONS.md gains the v4.6.0 entry, the
archived design reviews lose their markdown trailing whitespace so
`git diff --check` is clean, and the three merge-side PASS reports
(claude, agy, codex @ 4a81d15) are archived under .agents/reports/.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VCgu9Fa9iT7TbJUSzdq4Ff
Review 9a1adb46 (planner-reviewer-codex-01):
- R1 [P1] lib.sh new-session: a forwarded binding reached the agent as
arguments. With env flags the idle-pane branch prefixed `env K=V ...` to
the command that `herdr agent start ... --kind <agent> -- <args>` passes to
the agent executable. An idle pane is now reused only when no environment
has to be set; otherwise the pane is created by pane split / workspace
create, which take --env. The dead `env` prefix code is removed (its
send-text fallback would have typed the same line).
- R2 [P2] runner: a relative MAM_JOBS_DIR is resolved once against the
control root, the way the wrapper (cwd=workspace_root) reads it, and that
absolute dir is used for delegation, wait, report lookup and cleanup.
- R3 [P2] stop: the row's control_plane.delegate_job_logs_dir is restored
(exported unless the caller set DELEGATE_JOB_LOGS_DIR), so the
cancellation history lands in the row's audit-log root.
Tests: T3-1 and T3-3 now assert that the binding arrives as --env on the
pane-creation calls and that no env/K=V token follows `--` in agent start
(fresh and reused pane); T3-4c (audit root on stop) and T2-15 (relative
MAM_JOBS_DIR) are new. The design doc's compatibility table and a create
comment no longer describe the removed idle-pane env path.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017R3Eg7MEpSWnm1oB9ZPP6G
Fixes the sentences the four design reviews flagged and records what phase 1
actually implements: status line, monitor-topic scope, option A's isolation
and capacity wording, creator/reviewer ownership (tests write; promotion is
the control root's), the control-plane binding persisted and forwarded, two
loop recipes ((a) the loop implements, (b) the base recorded before an
out-of-loop implementation, then --base --review-only; no base in --task),
the loop lock as a refusal, "phase 1 = parallel implementation, one review
loop", the eight Issue #21 items with their status, and a new section 7 with
root definitions and a per-skill compatibility table. The review files are
unchanged. The loop SKILL.md lock note names the lock branch instead of line
numbers that moved.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017R3Eg7MEpSWnm1oB9ZPP6G
claude, agy, grok: PASS with amendments; codex: NOT PASS (recipe overstates
current env-override support; review identity and lifecycle ownership
underspecified). Direction (creator per worktree, shared reviewer pool)
agreed by all four.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VCgu9Fa9iT7TbJUSzdq4Ff
Design proposal for review (no code change): why the checkout-path
workspace assumption blocks parallel issues and caused the #18 checkout
switch, three candidate models, the recommended hybrid (writers isolated
per worktree, readers shared, one .mam control plane via env overrides),
how it maps onto today's scripts, what has to change, and the questions
put to the reviewers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VCgu9Fa9iT7TbJUSzdq4Ff
GodopuandClaude Fable 5.1