claude, agy, grok: PASS with amendments; codex: NOT PASS (recipe overstates
current env-override support; review identity and lifecycle ownership
underspecified). Direction (creator per worktree, shared reviewer pool)
agreed by all four.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VCgu9Fa9iT7TbJUSzdq4Ff
Design proposal for review (no code change): why the checkout-path
workspace assumption blocks parallel issues and caused the #18 checkout
switch, three candidate models, the recommended hybrid (writers isolated
per worktree, readers shared, one .mam control plane via env overrides),
how it maps onto today's scripts, what has to change, and the questions
put to the reviewers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VCgu9Fa9iT7TbJUSzdq4Ff