Issue #25: a promoted plan is reused only with --plan-file; the implicit
newest-plan load is gone in both runners, and an empty planner report no
longer passes silently. VERSIONS.md carries the entry; the four merge-side
review reports and their identity sidecars (base 6fc9194 -> head 1e82651,
evidence review-tree) are archived under .agents/reports/<session>/.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VCgu9Fa9iT7TbJUSzdq4Ff
Review R1/N1 (reviewer-grok-01, planner-reviewer-codex-01), reproduced before
fixing. The usage line and SKILL.md both promise "relative to the control
root", but parse_args did Path(...).expanduser().resolve(), which is relative
to the caller's cwd. The runner never chdirs to workspace_root, so the two are
routinely different - the documented recipe runs the loop from the control root
while the source root is a worktree.
Two ways it went wrong: a plan that exists only under the control root was not
found at all (exit 1), and a same-named file in the caller's cwd was loaded
instead, quietly putting an unrelated plan into the first implementation
prompt. That second one is the very failure #25 is about, reintroduced through
the option meant to replace it.
Resolve against workspace_root the way jobs_dir already does (Issue #21 R2);
pathlib's `/` leaves an absolute or expanded-home path untouched. Every earlier
test passed an absolute tmp_path, which is why none of them caught this: P3c
covers both failure modes with the control root away from the caller's cwd, and
P3d pins that absolute and ~ paths are not rewritten.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The skill described the implicit load as a feature in five places. Replace them
with what the loop does now: nothing is loaded without --plan-file, the path is
relative to the control root, and the plan rides the first implementation
prompt only. Adds the CLI table row and a section on what an empty plan report
means at each of the four load points.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
P1 is the reproduction: a running planner plus a promoted plan in its report
directory must not reach the Creator. P2 pins that a named plan is used, that
the newer unrelated one is not, and that the plan rides only the first
implementation prompt - the correction round carries feedback alone, as the
implicit load did too. P3-P5 keep the option's checks in front of any job.
P6 keeps --plan mode and its promotion working.
P9-P11 cover the loads the review widened: an empty initial plan stops the run,
an empty discussion refine keeps the previous plan, and an empty escalation
refine leaves the "follow the updated plan below" prompt carrying the real one.
The existing _drive helpers hand every job the same non-empty PASS report and
so cannot reach these paths at all, so this module drives the loop with its own
stub that scripts a report per job. P7-P8 pin wrapper/runner parity, the legacy
shell refusal, and that neither implementation globs for a plan any more.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The --plan-file check landed on the one path a human is watching. The three
--plan-mode loads read a report written by another agent with nobody watching,
and had no content check at all: find_report only tests that the path exists.
An empty or whitespace-only report therefore blanked current_plan in silence.
Phase 2's `if self.current_plan` then flipped the prompt to self-planning and
the run finished rc 0, having paid for a planner job, a Creator challenge and a
refine job and thrown the result away. The escalation refine was worse: it has
no guard, so the correction prompt asserted "follow the updated plan below" and
carried nothing.
All four loads share _plan_text() now - a plan is a readable regular file with
text in it - and each caller says what None means. An empty initial plan stops
the run instead of demoting it, and an empty refine warns and keeps the plan it
already has, which is still good. Those two together leave the escalation
prompt unable to claim a plan it does not carry, so it needs no new branch.
Found by the Creator's challenge to the plan (job 0f63ac1d), sustained by the
Planner as revision 1.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Without --plan, Phase 1 resolved a planner session automatically and globbed
<workspace_root>/.agents/reports/<planner>/plan-*.md for the newest file by
mtime, handing it to the Creator as "the plan already agreed on". Both keys are
wrong: the report directory belongs to a session, not to this task, so other
issues' plans pile up in it, and right after a clone or checkout mtime is
checkout order. 47 such plans are committed in this repository, so an ordinary
run could silently implement against an unrelated design.
Reuse is explicit now. --plan-file <path> is the only way to load an existing
plan; it is resolved against the control root, checked before a single job
exists, and refused if the file is missing, not a regular file, unreadable or
empty (an empty file would quietly turn into a "no plan" prompt). It cannot be
combined with --plan, and --review-only warns and ignores it because no
implementation job is delegated there. The implementation prompt itself is
unchanged, so the Creator's contract does not move.
Phase 1 now says which plan it loaded and where from, or that it loaded none.
The legacy shell loop (MAM_LOOP_PY=0) loses the same auto-load and rejects
--plan-file rather than duplicating the check on a path that is on its way out.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
GodopuandClaude Fable 5.1