multi-agent-mux/.agents/reports/reviewer-opencode-01/report-cb91f486.md

🔍 Post-Commit Cross-Review: v4.1.3 Release Packaging Commit 85a46ef (Job cb91f486)

• Reviewer: reviewer-opencode-01 (role: reviewer)
• Target: Commit 85a46ef — chore(release): bump framework and 8 skills to v4.1.3 (PATCH — herdr daemon isolation & Class A 0-turn resume reliability fixes) — plus the follow-up archive commit 4b2f703. Brief correctly states "(no changes since base commit)": the work is landed; this is a post-commit audit.
• Method: Every checklist item verified by me directly against the committed state — lockstep surfaces, version-consistency tests, reviewer-feedback integration (my own two nits from 71a1b000 were on the record), stray-literal sweep, and behavioral regression run.

---

1. Checklist item 1 — 3-Way Version Lockstep: ALL VERIFIED

Surface	Committed state	My check
lib.sh MAM_VERSION	"4.1.3"	Line 32 — exactly where the assessment should have cited it (my prior nit); the packaging commit edited the correct line
VERSIONS.md header	v4.1.3, date 2026-08-31 (KST)	Verified
VERSIONS.md prose (line 21)	v4.1.3으로 동기화되어 배포	Verified
VERSIONS.md matrix	all 8 rows 4.1.3	Verified
VERSIONS.md changelog	new ### 🛠️ v4.1.3 — Herdr Daemon Isolation & Class A 0-Turn Resume Reliability Fixes (2026-08-31) with C-1/C-2 entries	Verified — content matches the pre-agreed draft (assessment §5) and the actual commits: test_h26/test_t14/test_t16/test_t15 names, Class B preservation statement, 455-test milestone
8× SKILL.md frontmatter	all version: 4.1.3 (create, stop, resume, status, monitor, delegate-job, loop, orc-onboard)	Verified
test_version_consistency.py	2 passed (lockstep + env-override guard), my own run	Verified
Stray 4.1.2 literals	none in skills/tests/VERSIONS.md outside historical changelog sections	Verified
Regression	test_version_consistency.py + test_uuid_target.py: 17 passed (my own run); full-suite 455/455 was verified by me in 8bffb70b and no test files changed since	Verified

The v4.1.2 changelog section is preserved intact — no historical 유실.

2. Checklist item 2 — Reviewer-feedback integration: BOTH NITS ADDRESSED

My 71a1b000 review (convergent with Grok's ec2e02e2) flagged two items for the packaging job. Both were carried into 85a46ef's resume SKILL.md edit:

1. Line 55 body-text sync — DONE: "If both are empty → for Class A agents (agy, hermes, opencode), resume_session.sh automatically falls back to FRESH_SPAWN=1 (spawn-spec). For Class B agents (claude, grok), fall back to multi-agent-mux-create." — accurately describes the shipped behavior (matches the code I verified in 8bffb70b, gated by the agy|hermes|opencode case arm).
2. Workflow example (lines 71–74) — PARTIALLY DONE: the comment now says "For Class A, resume_session.sh handles fresh-spawn fallback automatically" and the error message is reworded for Class B, but the example's caller-side exit 1 still aborts for all agents including Class A — for a Class A caller the correct guidance is to just proceed to resume_session.sh. Grok (1acf4fb0) flagged the same residual. Non-blocking: the normative text (line 55) is correct; the example is illustrative, its comment points the right way, and a caller following the actual skill command (resume_session.sh directly) never executes this snippet. Recommend a follow-up docs polish to make the example branch on agent class.

3. Process integrity

• The assessment → consensus → packaging sequence was honored: assessment (no mutations, 6c24ddd0), three reviewer opinions (Claude 39439652 PASS, Grok ec2e02e2 PASS, my 71a1b000 PASS/concur — all archived byte-identical in 4b2f703, I verified my own archived copy matches my job artifact), then the atomic bump.
• Commit scope is exactly the 10 version surfaces + the resume SKILL.md body sync — no code drift smuggled into the release commit.
• Claude's 39439652 (assessment review) completed PASS — the consensus was genuinely 3/3 before packaging.
• Peer verdicts on 85a46ef itself: Grok 1acf4fb0 PASS (same L71-74 nit), agy 47539988 PASS; Claude 4d3c2c1c running at my report time.

4. Residual notes (non-blocking)

• The L71-74 example nit (§2.2) — one-line docs polish for a future commit.
• SemVer classification (v4.1.3 PATCH) was established by the 3/3 consensus round and the commit message correctly labels it PATCH.

---

5. Verdict

The v4.1.3 release packaging commit is complete and correct: strict 3-way lockstep holds (verified surface-by-surface plus the version-consistency tests), the changelog accurately documents the two Issue #3 fixes with correct test citations and Class B preservation, both reviewer nits from the consensus round were addressed in the packaging (line 55 fully; example partially with a benign residual), no stray literals or unauthorized changes exist, and the regression suite is green in my own runs. The consensus trail (assessment → 3/3 reviewer PASS → atomic bump → archive) is honest end-to-end.

[VERDICT: PASS]